This is not my meditation, it was created by Cellucidate:
Archive for the ‘Networks’ Category
Posted in Cancer, Causality, Evolution, Genetics, Levels, Models, Networks, Science, Stability, tagged Cancer, Causality, Evolution, Genetics, Levels, Models, Networks, Stability on July 22, 2009| 11 Comments »
Heng, et al recently published a review paper that brings together and touches on many different aspects of cancer complexity. I thought this an opportunity to selectively quote the paper and organize the quotes loosely around various complex systems concepts they relate to. I’m curious whether this makes sense to readers of this blog, or whether there’s too much unexplained jargon and too many large conceptual leaps. Please ask questions or make comments freely below.
One preface I think will help is to understand that genome, karyotype and chromosome refer roughly to the same thing. Here are several schematics that I will present without explanation that together illustrate how genes relate to genome/karyotype/chromosome structure, and how that in turn relates to the so-called genetic network (loosely equivalent to the “proteome”). Of course “gene” is an outdated and inaccurate concept, so don’t get too hung up looking for genes here, just understand that they are sub-structural elements of the genome.
From MSU website
Posted in Alternative Institutions, Autocatalysis, Causality, Economics, Interconnectedness, Interventions, Management, Markets, Networks, Non-linearity, Politics, Self-Fullfilling Prophecy, Socio-technical systems, Stability, tagged Alternative Institutions, Autocatalysis, Causality, Economics, Interconnectedness, Interventions, Management, Markets, Networks, Non-linearity, Politics, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, Socio-technical systems, Stability on April 23, 2009| 6 Comments »
With his permission, I am posting an email thread between myself and Alfred Hubler. I had contacted him on the recommendation of John Miller when Kevin and I were posting on the possibility of dampening boom-bust cycles in the financial markets through policy or other mechanisms. Here’s what Hubler had to say:
Posted in Agency, Cooperation, Emergence, Interconnectedness, Invisible Etiology, Medical Breakthroughs, Networks, Science, TED, tagged Agency, Cooperation, Emergence, Interconnectedness, Invisible Etiology, Medical Breakthroughs, Networks, Science, TED on April 8, 2009| Leave a Comment »
The import of this talk goes way beyond the specific and stunning work that Bassler and her team have done on quorum sensing. In my mind, this is the prototype for good biological science:
Posted in Economics, Government, Interconnectedness, Interventions, Markets, Networks, tagged Economics, Government, Interconnectedness, Interventions, Markets, Networks on April 6, 2009| 4 Comments »
I asked this question on twitter/facebook and got a lot of variants of “I agree” and only one person who stated disagreement (but provided inadequate reason, IMO). Jay Greenspan put it this way:
Interesting question this morning, and something I’ve been wondering about. I’ve yet to see anyone really argue that state of non-regulation we’ve been in for the last years has been a good idea. I’ve heard some thoughtful conservatives talk about how their views have changed radically — coming to understand that forceful regulation is absolutely necessary.
The super-conservatives I’ve seen are talking more about taxes, avoiding the subject. I’d be very interested to see a credible argument for a hands-off approach.
So how about it, anyone game to take up a considered argument for not mandating that companies who get big enough to affect the global economy should be broken up or otherwise handicapped?
One of my favorite talks of TED 2009 was from Tim Berners-Lee, the man often credited with (actually) inventing the Web. He’s been going on for quite a while about the coming of the “semantic web” and how it will be even bigger than the current web in terms of impact. But until his TED talk on linked data, I didn’t really get it. Now I do. And I think he’s right:
Posted in Agency, Artificial Intelligence, Emergence, Epistemology, Levels, Models, Networks, Singularity, Socio-technical systems, Superorganism, tagged Agency, Artificial Intelligence, Emergence, Epistemology, Levels, Models, Networks, Singularity, Socio-technical systems, Superorganism on December 28, 2008| Leave a Comment »
I’ve been trying to reconcile Rafe’s an my views on this topic. I actually think we agree on the broad themes related to our argument over “autonomy”. From my perspective, it seems like the only real disagreement is on the implications for humans.